Heroes of Ukraine

«Market Leader» - news and previews making you rich.

Thursday, 19 January 08:56 (GMT -05:00)



Business And Politics News

Why is "Market Leader" Banned by Uzbekistan Government?


 

Uzbekistannews. For decades much was banned in the USSR, from the books of Solzhenitsyn to "Voice of America" and "Radio Liberty", and the stronger were the appeals of communist ideologists to the party consciousness of Soviet people, the more attentively sensible people were listening to and reading what was banned. No fruit is so highly desired and sweet as the one that is banned.
 
The government of Muslim Uzbekistan does not seem to understand this biblical truth, having recently followed "the best traditions of former USSR" and banned initially "Radio Liberty", then Wikipedia (in Uzbek), and now the leading CIS portal for traders and investors "Market Leader" after its publication, jointly with "Ozodlik Radiosi" (Radio Liberty in Uzbekistan), of analytical article "For Investors: Who is Dearer to Russia Around CIS? What are the secrets of Russian and Uzbek relationships?" What frightened President Karimov?
 
What happened to

"Market Leader" portal in Uzbekistan?

From February 22, 2012 and up to the present day we keep receiving letters from various parts of Uzbekistan asking "Why isn’t it possible to study your web-site anymore?" This is how the web-portal www.profi-forex.org, which works around the clock, looks for Uzbekistan citizens. The site has simply become unavailable:
 
 
 

Who is banned for Uzbekistan citizens and why?

 
According to international organizations, Uzbekistan is at the end of the rating for the freedom of speech and democracy. Thus:
 ■ "Reporters Without Borders" has assigned 163rd position to Uzbekistan out of the total of 178 countries considered in the rating for the freedom of speech in 2010 (more details in the article "Uzbekistan: Will Investors Have "Silk Road" in the Country?") and  157th position in 2011;
 ■ The Daily Beast publishing house has called Uzbekistan the most corrupted country of the planet as of 2012. (by the way, Masterforex-V analysts and "Market Leader" do not fully support this, as shown in the article "For Investors: How Objective is The Daily Beast Rating of Most Corrupted Countries?")
 
What is banned in Uzbekistan? The list of bans for watching, reading, listening, doing, and even wearing for the citizens of this Middle East country is rather big. Banned in Uzbekistan are:
 - internet portals "Ozodlik Radiosi" (Radio Liberty in Uzbekistan), hosting blog "Live Journal", Wikipedia (in Uzbek), “BBC” (by Russian and regional government), "Lenta.ru", "Gazeta.ru", "Ferghana.ru". This list of "dangerous for Uzbekistan" media is now added by "Market Leader"
 - web-sites and press bearing religious (Islamic) or erotic character;
 - foreign news channels and broadcasting stations, for example, "Voice of America", BBC, and CNN;
 - Russian channels TNT and DTV;
 - over 700 local or foreign films (mostly horror films or actions, some parts of Russian series "Menty (Cops)", and cartoon "Shrek" translated by Goblin);
 - celebrations of Halloween and Valentine’s Day;
 - stores with women’s underwear;
 - selling white skullcaps, which symbolize faithful Muslims.
 
Freedom of speech in Uzbekistan is even worse than international ratings show, as explained in his interview to "Market Leader" by the expert of Masterforex-V Academy in Uzbekistan Ravshan S., Russian citizen that lives in Moscow, but regularly visits his historic motherland Uzbekistan. Ravshan explained that these ratings bear political character; in this reference, Uzbekistan (the country, with which the USA, Russia, Turkey, and China are trying to be on friendly terms) always receives higher position in the rating... than its real one. For example, according to the recent research of "Reporters Without Borders" on the freedom of press, Ukraine occupies 116th position, RF – 142nd position, Uzbekistan – 157th, Belarus – 168th.
 
In fact, freedom of speech in Belarus and Russia is by tens, if not by hundreds, higher than in Uzbekistan. See for yourselves, Ravshan explained his thesis:
 ■ how many opposition sites are there that criticize Lukashenko’s policy? InRFthereareevenmore. There is nothing similar in Uzbekistan (all opposition sites and their journalists work outside the country);
 ■ how many opposition protests have been there in Minsk or Moscow? CanyouimaginesomethinglikethisinTashkent? It a protest happens in Uzbekistan, all its participants, with no exception, their families and closest relatives will not only lose their jobs at once, but will also be imprisoned, or maybe even shot (as it happened in Andijan in 2005);
 ■ Belarus and Russian citizens can freely discuss political and economic news with their friends, but in Uzbekistan one will never dare to discuss the drawbacks not even of President Karimov’s policy (this is sacrilege in Uzbekistan), but everyday problems, for example (like mass gas shutdowns, rising prices for public utilities, etc.). My relatives clearly explained that I was not in Moscow, and that it was unaccepted to speak negatively about their country, and, what is more, about political power; otherwise... I may never return to Moscow again.
What country has poorer democracy and freedom of speech than Uzbekistan?
 
 

Ban on "Market Leader" magazine: what frightened official Tashkent?

 
Ban on "Market Leader" signals about a new trend of Uzbekistan policy – total ban even on those who have never criticized Uzbekistan, but whose independent analytics for investors is different from officially announced by Tashkent, as explained by a leading Canadian expert Evgeny Olkhovski. Simultaneous ban of extremely (?) religious, entertaining, or opposition web-sites may probably be explained, for every country decides in its own way how to deal with such issues. But what is the explanation to the ban on CIS leading internet portal for traders and investors, which does not discuss opposition or religious topics?
 
Reason for editorial policy of "Market Leader": investors are not interested in internal fights for power in any country, as they are far from it (opposite is demonstrated only by active help of G.Soros during the "Revolution of Roses" in Georgia and "Orange Revolution" in Ukraine in 2004). The rest 99.9% of investors are always interested only in the profit that they may gain by means of hundreds finance tools, such as shares, bonds, futures , stock indexes ranging from American Dow Jones or S&P500 to Russian RTS or MICEX, forex, bank deposits, real estate, tourism investments, precious metals (gold, brilliants), gas, oil, cotton, and much more.
 
The task of investors magazine is to give trends, having objectively shown all benefits and drawbacks of each of 200 world countries (economy, banks, tourism, real estate, government bonds, shares of leading enterprises, production volumes of local enterprises that influence future’s rate, rating of forex brokers , etc.) or one of several thousand financial instruments that may potentially bring profit to a trader or investor. Such work has no bearing on erotic, entertainment, opposition, or state activity of any country.
 
The task of investor is to join one of the mentioned and calculated tools or to stay aside of it, having understood if he is interested in investing in Uzbekistan, whose benefits include rich natural resources, favourable for transit geographic location, сильнаявласть, практическиполноеотсутствиепреступности (детейможноночьюотпускатьгулять, неволнуясьзаихбезопасность). Или важнее минусы того же Uzbekistanиз за которых в страну легко ввести средства, но как их там сохранить и получить через время обратно?
 
Maybe Tashkent does not need investors? Or maybe, according to the country’s government, there are no objects and spheres attractive for investment? On the contrary, Uzbekistan urgently needs foreign investment, as the country has a lack of currency, the rise of inflation is critical, and Uzbek sum devaluates every year, while only Russia remains the country’s major investor with the share of 60% (RF is the major foreign partner of Uzbekistan – 29.2%, the share of China amounts to 9.5%, Kazakhstan – to 8.3%, South Korea – to 7.4%, and Turkey – to 4.4%. ), and American and European investors do not take the risk of entering the country.
So why is "Market Leader" banned in Uzbekistan? "Needless worry is often combined with the loss of needed", as the Eastern saying goes, which is certainly known to Uzbek top officials.
 
 

What secret of Uzbekistan was revealed at "Market Leader" web-site?

Our expert Evgeny Antipenko (Ukraine) explained that if Tashkent has decided to pose a ban on editions analyzing investment attractiveness of countries and financial tools, it is necessary to understand which secrets have been revealed by the analysts Masterforex-V Academy and "Market Leader" magazine. It is evident that analytical article "For Investors: Who is Dearer to Russia Around CIS? What are the secrets of Russian and Uzbek relationships?" has become the last point. Thereisnoneedtoretellit. Read it and find your own answer to the question "Why truth by the eyes of investors is more dangerous than oppositional speeches?"
 
 

What does not understand the team of President Karimov about internet technologies?

"Internet cannot be banned if the country’s citizens have computers or mobile phones," explains our Czech expert Vladislav Tsarenko with a smile. For example, the easies way for Uzbekistan citizens that are interested in the articles of banned "Market Leader" to have free access to reading the materials is to use one of the following means:
1. Enter the full name of the article into Yandex or  Google searching system (click on the search), and you will see... 12 pages with links to over one hundred internet media that regularly copy this and other analytical articles from the leading internet portal for traders and investors. What shall Karimov’s team do? Shall it ban thousands of web-sites or Google, Yahoo, Bing and other searching systems at once? It is easier to withdraw all computers, smartphones, and mobile phones in the country, having returned to 19th century.
2. Anonymizer – enter this, probably unknown to you, term, and you will see tens of portals, by which any web-site can be reached (this method is used by millions of people on the globe, from office workers, whose employers block social networks like odnoklasniki.ru or vkontakte.ru, to Uzbekistan citizens, whose government restricts reading certain "banned issues" on political grounds). The number of anonymizers keeps rising; therefore, no country has yet managed to block them;
3. Via vpn and proxy server, when you enter internet using the ip address of a different country (monthly fee for vpn service amounts to 8-40 dollars)
 
From"Market Leader": the ban on our news issues and analytic comments to Uzbekistan Republic has truly surprised all journalists. There is nothing more tempting or interesting than something banned. "Wise is the person that avoids excess in his words and deeds," said a philosopher of the great country that Uzbekistan tries to follow. "Let us all be wise," we will add.
"Market Leader" magazine and Masterforex-V Trading Academy hold a questionnaire in Forex forum for traders and investors: Has "Market Leader" won or lost from a ban on its web-portal in Uzbekistan?
 ■ lost, as the citizens of entire country are banned from entering the web-site;
 ■ won, for a news ban from the President’s team is the best advertisement in World Wide Web.

 

 

 

You are free to discuss this article here:   forum for traders and investors

 

Add to blog
Got a question? – Ask it here »
 

Why Did Trump Decide to Defend Putin?

As Barack Obama is leaving the White House, the relations between Moscow and Washington are getting tenser. In this situation, President-Elect Trump is acting as Putin’s advocate.

 

 
For those of you who don’t know, Barack Obama expanded the sanctions against Russia in late 2016 as a respond to Russia’s cyber-attacks in advance of the U.S. presidential election won by Donald Trump. Obama’s decision implies further confrontations between the Kremlin and the U.S. Democrats, including Obama’s administration and American secret agencies.
Publication date: 18 January 07:09 AM

Trump Hates Democratic Standards, That’s Dangerous for the Entire World, Foreign Policy Expert Says

After the end of World War II, the international community started spreading democratic standards across the planet. The USA seems to have been the leader in spreading democracy around the world, at least until recently. Now many experts are concerned that the situation may change because of the fact that Donald Trump is about to become President of the United States.

 

 
In his speeches, President-Elect Trump questioned the democratic world a number of times. They are afraid that if he makes the USA stop fighting for justice, mutual respect, and peace in the entire world, many of those dictators in various parts of the world may get greater freedom and power, and may start threatening weaker nations.
Publication date: 18 January 05:03 AM

Trump's Isolationism Policy May Lead To Major Conflict, Roubini Says

Nouriel Roubini, a world-famous economist who predicted the 2008 global crisis, expressed his opinion on how Trump’s isolationism policy may affect the entire world.

 

 
First of all, Donald Trump’s victory during the latest presidential election in the USA is not just a populist attempt to react to globalization. Chances are, the very “Pax Americana” is coming to an end. For those of you who don’t know, this is a system led by the Western community based on free exchange and collective security and created by the USA and its allies after World War II.
Publication date: 15 January 06:30 AM

Trump Will Need Revolutionary Methods to Make America Great Again, Experts Say

It’s not a secret that Donald Trump has been the focus of international mass media ever since he decided to participate in the 2016 U.S. presidential election and eventually won it to become the 45th President of the United States.

 

 
For those of you who don’t know, President-Elect Trump promised to make America great again. If to take a closer look at his ambitious plan he is going to implement, it becomes clear why the current American political elite started accusing him of sexism, racism, and even fascism, not to mention other accusations.
Publication date: 13 January 06:12 AM

London Doesn't Know What To Do After Brexit

The United Kingdom seems to have already recovered from the shock triggered by the results of the Brexit referendum in June 2016. At this point, the British authorities are busy getting ready for quitting the European Union for good.
 

 

British Prime Minister Theresa May promised to appeal to Article 50 – the legal mechanism of quitting the EU. This is likely to happen in March 2017. She got a round of applause for saying that during the party conference. This means that even the High Court’s detailed investigation into the referendum results won’t prevent her from triggering the Brexit process. 
Publication date: 11 January 03:07 PM

New Global Crisis Is Coming, Some Experts Say

 

The very fact that more and more populists are getting integrated into the political elite all around the world is a sign that a new global economic and financial crisis is round the corner. Apparently, this is not the reason why the crisis is coming. This is just an indicator telling us just that.

 

Yet, this is not about Western Europe alone. Over the last few years, populism has become the world’s most popular political trend. But the question is, can we talk about one and the same phenomenon with common roots or can we say that the so-called global populism is nothing but fiction?

Publication date: 05 January 07:14 AM

Ukraine's 48 Achievements in November 2016

November 2016 happened to be full of good news and achievements for Ukraine and its economy. No months of the year goes without such achievements. The situation seems to be changing for the better on a regular basis.
 
In November 2016, the Supreme Military Court at The Hague recognized the Russian takeover of the Crimea on 2014 a military conflict. The Ukrainian were looking forward to Russia’s reaction to this court decision. At the same time, the Ukrainian government simplified the conditions for conduction a business in Ukraine. However, there was a pause in the Ukraine-IMF talks due to the government’s inefficiency in fighting corruption to get a loan. Along with political changes in Ukraine, there were some economic changes as well. Let’s take a closer look at them:
Publication date: 29 December 01:19 PM

Obama Calls Not to Make Hasty Conclusions About Trump's Policy

President Obama call the international community to avoid making hasty conclusions when it comes to President-Elect Trump’s future policies. He thinks that it’s important to avoid any premature conclusions and give the new president a chance to collect a team of experts and show the world what they all are capable of. This statement was made during the recent summit in Peru.
 
Publication date: 18 December 09:05 AM

Italy Throws Europe Into Uncertainty Period

For those of you who don’t know, during the recent referendum in Italy, the Italians voted against the constitutional reform offered by Premier Minister Matteo Renzi. This resulted in him wanting to resign his post. This means, that Italy is about to face a period of uncertainty, with either reformatting the government or early parliamentary elections.

Publication date: 15 December 08:47 AM

Trump’s Victory Won’t Bring Russia Any Good, Expert Says

According to Steen Jacobsen, chief economist for Saxo Bank, Donald Trump’s victory doesn’t necessarily mean that the Russian economy is going to benefit from that.

 

 
Mr. Jacobsen assumes that those who say that Donald Trump’s victory is a nightmare for America are completely wrong. His victory showed an urgent necessity of radical changes in the USA. Today, the USA is living in a world with the lowest labor productivity, the highest social inequality, the lowest interest rates and inflation, and the most inflated stock market in history.
If the latest U.S. presidential election had been all about candidates' personalities, and politics, neither Donald Trump, nor Hillary Clinton would have managed to become even candidates.
Publication date: 07 December 07:32 PM