Heroes of Ukraine

«Market Leader» - news and previews making you rich.

Thursday, 19 January 08:57 (GMT -05:00)



Business And Politics News

Tips For Investors: Is Daily Beast’s Corruption Rating Really Unbiased?


 

A country’s level of corruption is one of the main factors determining its investment attractiveness. No wise investor would probably invest in the economy of a highly-corrupted country. These days, when the entire world is on the verge of falling into the abyss of another major crisis, attracting foreign investment has become a matter of life and death for numerous economies around the globe.
 
Strange as it may seem but the more critical the global economic situation is, the more ratings are published. Not so long ago Western mass media (like The Guardian, The Financial Times, The New York Times, Forbes) reported that The Daily Beast had published its own international corruption rating. In other words, we can witness another attempt to divide the world into good and bad “guys”, i.e. corrupted countries and those that are corruption-free, democratic and attractive for investors.
 

 

 

 

How important are “corruption” ratings for investors?
 
According to Eugene Olkhovsky, Masterforex-V Academy’s leading expert, it is fairly easy to understand how can such ratings affect a country’s investment attractiveness.
 
Most investors pay attention to different ratings when deciding to invest in a foreign economy. By the way, more and more experts start questioning the objectivity of such ratings. Market Leader tries to be as objective as possible in highlighting any information that can be important to investors. It was noticed that when a certain rating irritates influential countries, they initiate publication bans and numerous investigations. It is sufficient to recollect, how the EU authorities started questioning the objectivity of international rating agencies after they started downgrading the credit ratings of European countries.
 
 
According to the experts of Masterforex-V Academy, when it comes to making any international rating, it should be unbiased, with transparent methodology and distinct criteria. Otherwise, a rating can quickly turn into a weapon of information warfare.
 
The Daily Beast’s rating
 
First of all, the rating is mainly based on Corruption Perceptions Index 2011 by Transparency International (for more details, please, also read Transparency International: Corruption Perception Index 2011 - Valuable Info For Investors Or Weapons Of Manipulating Public Opinion?)
 
The rating was made by The Daily Beast (a popular US edition), which doesn’t specialize in corruption ratings. Apart from Corruption Perceptions Index 2011 by Transparency International, the Daily Beast used Freedom House’s report on the freedom of the press and the latest data provided by the World Bank.
Transparency International is the only organization that makes scientifically-based corruption reports. It has a distinct definition of what corruption is while its index is based on a number of criteria. For more information, please, visit the official website.
 
However, The Daily Beast decided to expand Transparency International’s list of criteria, thus adding political rights, social freedoms and other irrelevant criteria.
 
The question arises: What is the object of the given research? Corruption or political and social freedoms? Obviously, these are different notions. Moreover, they contradict each other. There is very little or no corruption in totalitarian countries while corruption flourishes in those countries that make first democratic steps. It seems like we have a mere profanation here (I mean The Daily beast’s rating).
 
Uzbekistan is number 1, Belarus is number 6. Why?
This is unclear. The Daily Beast’s rating reveals only the world’s 20 Most Corrupt Countries (unlike TI’s Corruption Perceptions Index).
The Daily Beast’s rating looks as follows:
1. Uzbekistan (89,6 out 100)
 2. Eritrea (87,8 out 100)
 3. Laos (87,8 out 100)
 4. Afghanistan (86,3 out 100)
 5. Equatorial Guinea (84,2 out 100)
 6. Belarus (83 out 100)
 7. Congo (82,5 out 100)
 8. Swaziland (81,3 out 100)
 9. Iran (79,1 out 100)
 10. Ethiopia (78,5 out 100)
 11. Chad (78,2 out 100)
 12. Syria (76,8 out 100)
 13. Cote d’Ivoire (76,4 out 100)
 14. Venezuela (76 out 100)
 15. Iraq (75,5 out 100)
 16. Yemen (73,9 out 100)
 17. Burundi (73,6 out 100)
 18. Angola (72,3 out 100)
 19. Cambodia (71,9 out 100)
 20. Haiti (69,9 out 100).
 
There are some major changes in comparison with TI’s Corruption Perceptions Index 2011.
 
According to Transparency International’s index, Uzbekistan was number 5. The daily beast made it the world’s most corrupted country, thus eliminating Somali (by the way, Somali wasn’t included in the rating for some strange reasons). North Korea and Turkmenistan were also eliminated from the list (they were number 2 and 6 in TI’s rating).
It is not accidental that Iran is in the same list of highly-corrupted countries, especially amid the current confrontation between Iran and the West (the Strait of Hormuz, the oil embargo, various sanctions, Iran’s controversial nuclear program.)
The most shocking an unexpected change is that Belarus suddenly rallied from number 39 (Transparency international) up to number 6 (The Daily Beast). What on earth happened in Belarus that forced The Daily Beast into making such changes?
 
 
Dmitriy Frantsevich, the head of the Belarusian Association of Traders and Investors under Masterforex-V Academy, is sure that even despite the fact that the USA and the EU keep questioning the Belarusian democracy, Belarus is not as corrupted as the Daily Beast thinks.  In fact, Belarus is less corrupted that some other states of the former USSR. Anyway, it cannot be the world’s 6th most corrupted country.
 
Corruption is a delicate issue, which needs a delicate approach. However, The Daily Beast seems to be manipulating the data taken from other competent sources to pursue some shady goals (probably some orders from above). The Daily Beast’s rating looks biased and hardly deserves investors’ attention.
 
Market Leader and Masterforex-V Academy would appreciate if you could participate in a survey. Please, visit the Academy’s forum for traders and investors and answer the following question:
 
In your opinion, Is The Daily Beast’s rating worth being trusted?

 

 

You are free to discuss this article here:   forum for traders and investors

 

Add to blog
Got a question? – Ask it here »
 

Why Did Trump Decide to Defend Putin?

As Barack Obama is leaving the White House, the relations between Moscow and Washington are getting tenser. In this situation, President-Elect Trump is acting as Putin’s advocate.

 

 
For those of you who don’t know, Barack Obama expanded the sanctions against Russia in late 2016 as a respond to Russia’s cyber-attacks in advance of the U.S. presidential election won by Donald Trump. Obama’s decision implies further confrontations between the Kremlin and the U.S. Democrats, including Obama’s administration and American secret agencies.
Publication date: 18 January 07:09 AM

Trump Hates Democratic Standards, That’s Dangerous for the Entire World, Foreign Policy Expert Says

After the end of World War II, the international community started spreading democratic standards across the planet. The USA seems to have been the leader in spreading democracy around the world, at least until recently. Now many experts are concerned that the situation may change because of the fact that Donald Trump is about to become President of the United States.

 

 
In his speeches, President-Elect Trump questioned the democratic world a number of times. They are afraid that if he makes the USA stop fighting for justice, mutual respect, and peace in the entire world, many of those dictators in various parts of the world may get greater freedom and power, and may start threatening weaker nations.
Publication date: 18 January 05:03 AM

Trump's Isolationism Policy May Lead To Major Conflict, Roubini Says

Nouriel Roubini, a world-famous economist who predicted the 2008 global crisis, expressed his opinion on how Trump’s isolationism policy may affect the entire world.

 

 
First of all, Donald Trump’s victory during the latest presidential election in the USA is not just a populist attempt to react to globalization. Chances are, the very “Pax Americana” is coming to an end. For those of you who don’t know, this is a system led by the Western community based on free exchange and collective security and created by the USA and its allies after World War II.
Publication date: 15 January 06:30 AM

Trump Will Need Revolutionary Methods to Make America Great Again, Experts Say

It’s not a secret that Donald Trump has been the focus of international mass media ever since he decided to participate in the 2016 U.S. presidential election and eventually won it to become the 45th President of the United States.

 

 
For those of you who don’t know, President-Elect Trump promised to make America great again. If to take a closer look at his ambitious plan he is going to implement, it becomes clear why the current American political elite started accusing him of sexism, racism, and even fascism, not to mention other accusations.
Publication date: 13 January 06:12 AM

London Doesn't Know What To Do After Brexit

The United Kingdom seems to have already recovered from the shock triggered by the results of the Brexit referendum in June 2016. At this point, the British authorities are busy getting ready for quitting the European Union for good.
 

 

British Prime Minister Theresa May promised to appeal to Article 50 – the legal mechanism of quitting the EU. This is likely to happen in March 2017. She got a round of applause for saying that during the party conference. This means that even the High Court’s detailed investigation into the referendum results won’t prevent her from triggering the Brexit process. 
Publication date: 11 January 03:07 PM

New Global Crisis Is Coming, Some Experts Say

 

The very fact that more and more populists are getting integrated into the political elite all around the world is a sign that a new global economic and financial crisis is round the corner. Apparently, this is not the reason why the crisis is coming. This is just an indicator telling us just that.

 

Yet, this is not about Western Europe alone. Over the last few years, populism has become the world’s most popular political trend. But the question is, can we talk about one and the same phenomenon with common roots or can we say that the so-called global populism is nothing but fiction?

Publication date: 05 January 07:14 AM

Ukraine's 48 Achievements in November 2016

November 2016 happened to be full of good news and achievements for Ukraine and its economy. No months of the year goes without such achievements. The situation seems to be changing for the better on a regular basis.
 
In November 2016, the Supreme Military Court at The Hague recognized the Russian takeover of the Crimea on 2014 a military conflict. The Ukrainian were looking forward to Russia’s reaction to this court decision. At the same time, the Ukrainian government simplified the conditions for conduction a business in Ukraine. However, there was a pause in the Ukraine-IMF talks due to the government’s inefficiency in fighting corruption to get a loan. Along with political changes in Ukraine, there were some economic changes as well. Let’s take a closer look at them:
Publication date: 29 December 01:19 PM

Obama Calls Not to Make Hasty Conclusions About Trump's Policy

President Obama call the international community to avoid making hasty conclusions when it comes to President-Elect Trump’s future policies. He thinks that it’s important to avoid any premature conclusions and give the new president a chance to collect a team of experts and show the world what they all are capable of. This statement was made during the recent summit in Peru.
 
Publication date: 18 December 09:05 AM

Italy Throws Europe Into Uncertainty Period

For those of you who don’t know, during the recent referendum in Italy, the Italians voted against the constitutional reform offered by Premier Minister Matteo Renzi. This resulted in him wanting to resign his post. This means, that Italy is about to face a period of uncertainty, with either reformatting the government or early parliamentary elections.

Publication date: 15 December 08:47 AM

Trump’s Victory Won’t Bring Russia Any Good, Expert Says

According to Steen Jacobsen, chief economist for Saxo Bank, Donald Trump’s victory doesn’t necessarily mean that the Russian economy is going to benefit from that.

 

 
Mr. Jacobsen assumes that those who say that Donald Trump’s victory is a nightmare for America are completely wrong. His victory showed an urgent necessity of radical changes in the USA. Today, the USA is living in a world with the lowest labor productivity, the highest social inequality, the lowest interest rates and inflation, and the most inflated stock market in history.
If the latest U.S. presidential election had been all about candidates' personalities, and politics, neither Donald Trump, nor Hillary Clinton would have managed to become even candidates.
Publication date: 07 December 07:32 PM