Heroes of Ukraine

«Market Leader» - news and previews making you rich.

Wednesday, 24 May 05:39 (GMT -05:00)



Business And Politics News

Investing In Video Games: Pay To Play Or Free To Play?

Investing In Video Games: Pay To Play Or Free To Play?

The video game industry in the US and Europe seems to have reached its climax. Millions of gamers are looking forward to purchasing their own copy of another bestseller. They are ready to pay monthly fees for playing online and to buy various artifacts and items to take advantage over their enemies. Investors now seem to be more willing to invest millions in the industry.

The video game market of the CIS states is not as developed as the western one. Consequently, it presents special interest to the giants of the global video game industry. Pay to play and free to play are the 2 basic business approaches to earning on MMORPGs.


What are the essential differences between these two business approaches?

 

 

 



Pay To Play Or Free To Play: Which Is Better For Investors?


According to Vladislav Tsarenko, Masterforex-V Academy’s video game expert, pay to play (PTP) and free to play (FTP) are essentially different approaches. PTP implies monthly or annual fees for playing a certain MMORPG while a free-to-play MMORPG speaks for itself: no fee is charged unless a gamer wants to buy some artifacts or to upgrade his/her character to get an edge in the game.  


Free to play. FTP is more popular among developers. Its major advantage is that a gamer can test it for free without any limitations. That is why such games are more popular and widespread. Everybody likes freebies. If a free-to-play game is really awesome, then sooner or later some gamers will want to upgrade their characters or simply to get an edge over their enemies. A gamer’s desire to become stronger, faster and better than opponents seems to be the major market driver. It makes more and more video game developers start their free-to-play MMORPGs, with millions invested in these projects.  Such upgrade fees are usually small for an average gamer – $5 to $10. Of course not all the gamers who play FTP MMORPGs pay such fees. Moreover, when a game’s rules and conditions are really tough, most gamers will start leaving the game. In this case, others won’t upgrade because this just won’t make any sense. So when creating a successful FTP game, a developer should focus on the balance between the paying minority and the “we like freebies” majority. Numerous bonuses and promotions should help developers encourage their clients to pay.

There are many free-to-play games on the net, including Perfect World, Allods Online, Land Of Chaos, Granado Espada etc.

Pay to play. Unlike FTP, a gamer, who wants to play a PTP game, has to pay a monthly fee to get an access to it. This approach is often used for the industry’s coolest, high-budget games created by the world’s best developers. Considerable funds are spent on advertising campaigns and beta-testing to make such a game extremely popular and highly anticipated even before the official release. World Of Warcraft (WoW) may serve as a striking example of a play-to-play MMORPG.  This game was highly anticipated because it was a sequel to the famous WarCraft series created by Blizzard, a video game giant (for more details read the article “Tips For Investors: Blizzard Conquers Video Game Industry”). As a result, over 13 million gamers around the world keep paying monthly fees ($10 - $15) to play this MMORPG.

However, developing a pay-to-play game is always risky. Such a game should be really good to interest gamers so much that they would want to pay regularly for playing it. That is why developers always start beta-testing before the official release of a PTP game.  During the period of beta-testing gamers get a free access to the game in order to decide whether to continue playing it after the official release.

The biggest advantage of this approach is that EVERYONE PAYS. Another plus is that all the gamers are equal in rights and cannot buy an edge over their opponents, like it is done in a free-to-play game. The major drawback is that a PTP game can fail to come up to gamers’ expectations. In this case, the game is doomed to become unprofitable because nobody (or very few gamers) will pay. The Russian version of Warhammer Online is a striking example. The developers ignored the fact that the CIS’s gaming community is far less willing to pay for games, thus preferring free-to-play MMORPGs.


These are some of the most popular pay-to-play games : World of Warcraft, The Lord of the Rings Online, Warhammer Online, Star Wars: The Old Republic.
 

 

диаграмма

 

Hybrid approaches. To tell the truth, these days there are very few games that are 100% PTP or FTP. Most pay-to-play games are modified so as to provide free-to-play options up to a certain level. Later a gamer will have to switch to the paid mode if he/she wants to continue playing and developing his/her character. Moreover, some PTP games offer some items a gamer can buy for his/her character. Fortunately, they don’t give gamers an edge over their opponents. On the other hand, free-to-play game projects offer their clients an opportunity to get a premium/VIP account. This is a set of certain bonuses and VIP services for those clients who have paid a certain monthly fee.

Therefore, developers strive to utilize the strong sides of both the approaches to make as much money as possible. Once again, WoW can be cited as a striking example here. The developers have recently allowed their clients to play WoW for free until they reach level 20. Moreover, the gamers can pay to change the name of their clans or to purchase pets. Blizzard has recently confessed that by rendering these “small” services the company earns big money. For example, a pet costs up to $25.

The bottom line:
When investing in a MMORPG it is necessary to determine which business approach it will be based on.


If it is a pay-per-play game, an investor should find out if the advertising campaign is good enough to make the game highly anticipated and to attract an army of devoted fans who will be paying monthly fees.


If it is a free-to-play game, everything is simpler. The only thing an investor should do prior to investing is to evaluate the quality of the game, i.e. whether it is good and interesting enough to make gamers pay for various items that will make their characters better, stronger and faster than their opponents. Once again, make sure that both the paying minority and the “we like freebies” majority will get what they want. The former will pay only when they want to get an edge over the latter.

Market Leader and Masterforex-V Academy would appreciate if you could participate in a survey. Please, visit the Academy’s forum for traders and investors and answer the following question:


In your opinion, what kind of MMORPG is better to invest in?
 

 

You are free to discuss this article here:   forum for traders and investors

 

Add to blog
Got a question? – Ask it here »
 

Macron Will Shift the Balance of Powers in the Normandy Format in Favor of Ukraine

For those of you who don’t know, the so-called Normandy format was created to resolve the difficult situation in the East of Ukraine. France is one of the participants. As you know, Emmanuel Macron has recently won the presidential election in France. This means that he is going to become the successor to Francois Hollande as President of France, participating in the Normandy format as the French representative.

 

 
Publication date: 17 May 08:48 AM

Stratfor Gave Prediction for the next 3 Months

The other day, Stratfor released another quarterly prediction for the global geopolitical situation.
 

 

According to the report, the USA will try to settle the nuclear dispute with North Korea. Europe will be waiting for the results of the presidential election in France. Russia will dive even deeper into the local problems. The OPEC will extend the Vienna Accord aimed at cutting oil production.
 
Publication date: 10 May 10:26 AM

The Price of Defeating North Korea May Be Too High

These days, more and more experts start talking about a possible war against North Korea. However, they also say that the price of defeating North Korea may be too high for the USA and its allies.

 

 
For now, North Korea seems to have made considerable progress in creating nuclear arms, which is something that worries the entire world, especially as North Korea keeps on making harsh statements and threatening the USA, South Korea and Japan. The recent test launch of ballistic missiles in North Korea are now treated as wake-up call and real threat. Theoretically, there is a threat that North Korea may hit American military facilities located in Japan and South Korea. As the US Navy is moving closer to the Korean peninsula, international observers are talking about the possibility of another armed conflict between North and South Korea, even though both of them are still at war with each other.
Publication date: 26 April 01:16 PM

Sixteen Structural Reforms Is the Cost of the Next IMF Tranche to Ukraine

Anders Aslund, a Swedish economist and a Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council, commented on the current and future cooperation between the IMF and Ukraine. He claims that Kiev will have to implement at least 16 structural reforms in order to get another tranche from the International Monetary Fund. He also explained why the IMF is still cooperating with Ukraine.

Publication date: 26 April 11:01 AM

Putin Underestimated Ukrainians When Invading Ukraine, Atlantic Council

American private institution Atlantic Council assumes that Vladimir Putin underestimated the Ukrainians when invading Ukraine.
 

 

They say that the hybrid war started by Russia in Ukraine has been going on for the 4th year. There were times when nobody believed that Ukraine would hold on even for 4 weeks. The thing is, the Crimea was annexed without any fight, which made international experts believe that Ukraine was weak and completely dependent on Russia. This stand point used to be popular in Moscow as well. Some Russian politicians expected a complete victory in a couple of months, but back than Ukraine was vulnerable after the revolution, which lead to the end of Yanukovich’s regime, while the temporary government was lacking legitimacy to seriously resist Russia. Back then, Russia got a chance to occupy the rest of Ukraine. Vladimir Putin seemed to be encouraged by the success in the Crimea.
Publication date: 26 April 08:37 AM

Experts on Statements Made by Russian Officials about Russian Economic Recovery

International experts have commented on the recent statements made by several Russian officials about some economic recovery in Russia. They say that the weak economic growth isn’t backed by higher standards of living in the Russian Federation.

Publication date: 23 April 02:05 AM

USA Today Names the Reasons Why the USA Is Concerned about the Situation in Ukraine

USA Today has named the reasons why the United states should be concerned about the armed conflict in the East of Ukraine.

 

Previously, US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson asked his European colleagues why American taxpayers should be concerned about the situation in Ukraine. The answer came from his French colleague, who said that the United States should be interested in a strong Europe. On top of that, there are some other reasons why the USA shouldn’t stop thinking about Ukraine.

Publication date: 21 April 12:00 PM

Trump's Plan on Syria: Russia to Stay in Syria, Asad Has to Leave

At this point, several media sources, including Associated Press, report they know the details of the offer brought by Rex Tillerson to Moscow during his official visit. Now, everyone seems to be wondering what exactly Rex Tillerson and Sergey Lavrov discussed during their meeting in Moscow.
 

 

First of all, the sources claim that the USA is ready to unite forces with Russia to destroy the ISIS once and for all. Secondly, Bashar Asad has to quit anyway. He will be even allowed to go to Russia or Iran to avoid prosecution. Thirdly, a temporary government need to be established in Syria to back stabilization and holding a democratic election in Syria. Russia can stay in Syria to back security but they shouldn’t interfere with the local politics.
Publication date: 18 April 11:34 PM

Today's Russia-US Relations Are Worse Than During Obama’s Administration

At this point, the bilateral relations between Moscow and Washington are even worse than they used to be during Obama’s administration. This is what President Putin thinks on the matter.

 

 
Even though the Russian president thinks so, he hasn’t commented on the details of this degradation in the bilateral relations between the 2 superpowers. He assumes that the level of trust between the United States and the Russian Federation has dropped, especially on the military level.
 
Publication date: 18 April 11:05 PM

Will North Korea Become Another Syria for the USA?

The latest events in Syria made many international observers change their mind regarding President Trump. The current conditions also show that getting rid of North-Korean leader Kim Jong Un may also become a major goal for President Trump.

 

 
The news that U.S. aircraft carrier Carl Vinson suddenly reversed and moved to the Western part of the Pacific Ocean in the direction of the Korean Peninsula attracted the interest of the international community. Given the 59 missiles launched to hit a Syrian airbase a couple of weeks ago, this maneuver of the aircraft carrier does raise a lot of concerns.
Publication date: 18 April 03:29 AM